Former Florida Official Shot in the Head by Wife Over Google Search Dispute; Wife Charged With Attempted Murder

A dispute over a Google search has left former Florida official Tony Brown in critical condition after being shot in the back of the head by his wife.

Former Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency executive director Tony Brown, 58, was airlifted to UF Health Hospital on Tuesday (May 29). He is scheduled to have brain surgery on Thursday to remove bullet fragments.

Lawanda Brown, Tony’s wife, was arrested on Wednesday and charged with attempted murder. A judge set bond at $500,002. As of this writing, she remains held in Nassau County Jail.

“It was all a blur,” Lawanda described the shooting to investigators.

According to the 57-year-old, the confrontation began after Tony asked his wife to do a Google search for a template to use for a project the couple was working on. Lawanda says she didn’t like Tony’s tone and could tell that he was not happy with how she was conducting the search.

Authorities arrived at the couple’s Fernandina Beach home around 1:30 p.m. to find Tony lying in a pool of blood with a gunshot wound in the back of his head. Tony was walking away from Lawanda prior to being shot.

Police found a .38 caliber handgun in the couple’s bedroom.

Tony became Riviera Beach’s CRA director in 2010 but was fired in 2016, along with the CRA chairman, due to concerns with their leadership.

In 2001, President George W. Bush nominated Tony for a position in the U.S. Treasury Department. Prior to the nomination, Tony was a Senior Vice President for Bank of America in Jacksonville, Fla.

He’s now CEO of T. Brown Consulting Group, a consulting business he runs with his wife and alleged shooter, Lawanda. The two were working on a project together in their home office at the time of the incident.

A friend of the family says Tony is lucid and speaking, his condition was recently upgraded from critical to serious and stable. But brain surgery to remove bullet fragments is still needed.

Former Florida Official Shot in the Head by Wife Over Google Search Dispute; Wife Charged With Attempted Murder is a post from: Gossip On This – Pop Culture, News, Videos & Humor

Powered by WPeMatico

I Wasn’t Annoyed by the Part of Han Solo’s Backstory That Annoyed Everyone Else—Here’s What Did Annoy Me

Han Solo and Chewbacca in 'Solo: A Star Wars Story

There are definitely mixed reactions to Solo: A Star Wars Story. You can go ahead and put me firmly in the “loved it” camp. It wasn’t a perfect movie, but it was enjoyable from beginning to end, and I had a lot of fun. There seems to be one element of the plot in particular that sticks in people’s craws in a way that hasn’t stuck in mine.  [SPOILERS AHOY!]

In Solo, we learn the origin of Han Solo’s surname and many fans were not thrilled about it. As it turns out, while Han is trying to escape Corellia by becoming a pilot in the Imperial fleet, he is asked for his name. “Han,” he says. And when asked for his surname, he says that he has no people (and no last name) and that he’s traveling alone. So the guard types in “solo” after his first name.

And there you have it.

The fan reaction looked a little something like this:

And of course, there were the inevitable jokes:

Personally, I loved how Han got his name, and actually thought it not only touching in and of itself, but really well played by Ehrenreich in the role, for the reasons that co-screenwriter (and Star Wars guru) Lawrence Kasdan cites in a recent interview.

When speaking with Cinema Blend, Kasdan explains that this very plot point was what sold the powers that be on the film in the first place when he pitched it:

“Five years ago, when I came onto the thing – and Disney wasn’t on when I came on, then three weeks later, they owned the company – and they came up to Marin [California] and Kathy [Kennedy] and got the people who were already working on it to make a five-minute presentation to Bob Iger and Alan Horn and everyone. My presentation was, [Han] comes to an immigration spot and someone asks, ‘What’s your name?’

“It’s not just that he doesn’t have a name, which tells you a lot about his history. He says ‘I have no people.’ That to me is so forlorn and so isolating and rife, and the guy fills in his name. Bob Iger said ‘Alright, I’m in.’ That was it. That was the moment.”

When I saw the film, that was exactly how I responded to that moment. Not only the way he says “I have no people,” which is, indeed, so emotional, but knowing the fact that he not only keeps that name, but passes it down, owning that lack of a known family as his identity and as part of the family he ends up building. That’s huge. That’s who Han is. A completely self-made, self-invented person.

The way my nerd brain works, though, I immediately started thinking about the etymological implications of this and I would love any insights into this from any word nerds in the house! I thought, ‘Solo’ meaning ‘alone’ comes from Latin-based languages like Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese. But if we’re not hearing ‘English,’ but ‘Galactic Basic,’ is there a Galactic equivalent of Latin? If not, does this pun even work if there’s no Latin/Spanish/Italian in the Star Wars universe?’

THESE are the important questions, friends. But those questions only made me enjoy the film even more!

Now, here’s the name-related plot element that bugged me. When Han meets Chewbacca and learns his name for the first time, he says something like “Chewbacca? You’re going to need a nickname, because I’m not going to say all that.”

‘Cause we all know he calls him ‘Chewie,’ right? Hahahahahahaaha…. um.

THAT, to me, was the most asinine line in the whole thing. 1) Because Chewbacca is not actually that long a name. It’s three goddamn syllables, 2) You don’t just announce the need for a nickname! Nicknames are way more organic than that, and 3) Going from Chewbacca to Chewie isn’t a process that requires this huge leap to understand. Chewie is literally what anyone who knows Chewbacca for any length of time might call him.

So if people think Han’s surname backstory is “unnecessary,” the need to have him be the kind of person who can’t/won’t say “Chewbacca” is even moreso.

Names are important to a certain degree. Sometimes, like in the case of the surname “Solo,” they can be purposeful and come with a wealth of character information. Other time, like in the case of “Chewie,” they’re….just a name. (Or, a nickname) Here’s to not placing an undue burden on character names by knowing which is which.

(via Express, image: Lucasfilm/Disney)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

Evan Rachel Wood Addresses Double Standard Responses Towards Dolores and The Man in Black

Evan Rachel Wood in Westworld (2016)

Television is filled with really exciting and nuanced female characters in both main and support roles. However, the flip side of that is that women are also hyper-criticized online from all angles and for different reasons. When it comes to wives or love interests especially, they often get called “bitches” or “shrews” or viewed much more aggressively for their mistakes in comparison to their male counterpart, who are allowed to make mistakes, be wrong, and grow from it.

Even when it comes to a female character making a turn from heroic to more villainous in action, there is a lot of excess hatred thrown at them. The problem isn’t that they are hated, it’s that it turns into them just being called “bitches” while their male counterparts, no matter if they are rapists, extremists or something just as vile, if they give you a sob story people will rally for them. That’s what Westworld actress Evan Rachel Wood has brought up concerning her character Doloros on this latest season of HBO’s Westworld.

Now it is 100% fair to not like what Dolores is doing, no spoilers for those still catching up, but in the most recent episode, she does something pretty horrible to Teddy.

I personally have found it interesting that the character is definitely taking a turn towards the dark side, especially considering all that we know about Dolores so far. I enjoy narratives about women who mean well in the beginning but end up getting corrupted by power.

All that being said, even if you don’t find Dolores interesting, what Wood is talking about is the double standard.

The way that we turn on female characters who don’t fit our expectation and express that hatred in gendered, dismissive ways, while uplifting male characters for being able to shed a tear or monologue about something from Western Philsphony 101 after they brutalize someone else. People have been fans of The Man in Black since he appeared, even though he was a cruel rapist, because when has that ever stopped someone from rooting for a man. So this idea that Dolores is a bitch and MiB is “misunderstood” is trash.

From Skyler White to Catelyn Tully to Tara Knowles to every female love interest on a CW superhero show, fandom will call you a bitch for breathing with too much agency, even when your love interest is a criminal who constantly puts your life and the lives of everyone else in danger.

(image by FX)

(via Twitter, image: HBO)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

New Avengers 4 Logo Seems to Highlight an Unexpected Hero

Hawkeye in Avengers 4

Infinity War, we hardly knew ye. So begins our wild speculations about Avengers 4, due next spring and ramping up to break our hearts all over again.

Welcome back to Avengers College, class! Summer school is now in session. While I’m likely not done discussing Infinity War yet (I will never quite be done discussing Infinity War), details are already starting to leak out about the super-uber-top-secret Avengers 4. 

How totally under wraps and locked down with vibranium chains is Avengers 4? We don’t even know the title yet—the directing Russos have insisted that the title in and of itself is a spoiler—but we do know some (vague) things! A synopsis of Avengers 4 in Licence Magazine said that the movie is “the turning point of this epic journey” and that “our beloved heroes will truly understand how fragile this reality is and the sacrifices that must be made to uphold it,” which could mean, well, anything. (Though I like thinking about “how fragile this reality is” leading to a potentially trippy movie making use of the Infinity Stones’ powers.)

Infinity War and Avengers 4 were filmed back-to-back, and initially were meant to be parts 1 and 2, but now it seems that Avengers 4 is being positioned as more of its own movie rather than simply a sequel—though of course we expect it to address the conflicts begun in Infinity War.

Notably, Avengers 4 has to somehow resolve Thanos’ Snapture, and bring back some of our favorite heroes that we know for certain have continuing contracts with Marvel: Black Panther, Spider-Man, Bucky Barnes, and most of the Guardians, at the very least (Gamora status unknown, but we’re hoping).

Savvy watchers of Infinity War realized after The Snapture that the majority of the heroes left undusted were the original Avengers: Tony Stark, Steve Rogers, Thor, Natasha Romanoff, and Bruce Banner. Other important characters remaining are Okoye, Rocket Raccoon, Rhodey Rhodes, and Nebula (Shuri status unknown, but we’re hoping she’s just fine and about to take up the Black Panther mantle for a while). But the core cast all staying alive implies that a good deal of Avengers 4 could see Earth’s Mightiest Heroes working together (perhaps for the last time, sob) to reverse Thanos’ snap. Also, at some point, Carol Danvers will likely arrive to save the world.

Considering how much we don’t know, every little potential detail is getting parsed and analyzed. Such is the case with a picture of an alleged Avengers 4 crew jacket. The colors at play have some fans and writers speculating that this suggests an emphasis on one hero in particular:

Yes, as CBR points out, that purple and black might well point to Jeremy Renner’s Hawkeye/Clint Barton, as those are his traditional colors. If you recall, the Russos trolled everyone epically by first not including any promotions of Hawkeye after the initial trailer/poster, and then implying that he still had an epic, mysterious role to play—only for Clint not to show up in Infinity War at all. It’s mentioned in passing that he and Scott Lang, a.k.a. Ant-Man, took a deal with the government on account of their families and were essentially living under a kind of house arrest.

Hawkeye in Avengers

But post-Infinity War, any government agreements—if governments remain intact at all—are likely null and void with half the galaxy vanished, and if Clint lost members of his family, he’ll be keen to join the fight. If he lost his whole family, this could explain all of the rumors that he’ll be taking up the “lone Samurai” Ronin identity. While we initially believed that this would be a plot point in Infinity War, it now makes even more sense if it happens in Avengers 4.

The screenwriters have already confirmed that Hawkeye will have a bigger role to play in Avengers 4, but seeing as how he had zero role this time around, who knows what that means? Kevin Feige stated that “there are big, big story things coming up for Hawkeye,” but frankly I trust no one at Marvel anymore to play straight with us.

Hawkeye toy

I expect we’ll definitely be seeing Clint Barton in Avengers 4, possibly rejoining his old team or possibly embarking on a quest all his own. The color scheme above, however, might just be pointing to another purple-oriented dude, Thanos. Considering the general lack of love Hawkeye has received from the franchise, I think Thanos is more likely, but hey, you never know. Clint wears his violet hues much better.

Hawkeye in Marvel Comics

Meanwhile, while the movie’s title continues to be a mystery, some folks are pretty confident that it’s Avengers: Infinity Gauntlet. Okay, class, for homework: what do you think about this supposed logo, and if it is a Hawkeye reference, are you ready to see a big part for Clint or were you okay with his house arrest?

UPDATE: Our commenter points out that purple and black can also be Black Panther’s colors. While it’s unknown how much of a role T’Challa has in Avengers 4 since he’s among The Dusted, maybe this could be a nod to Marvel expanding that part after Black Panther‘s phenomenal success? All of your speculations, give them to us.

Black Panther costume

(via CBR.com, image: Marvel Studios, Marvel Comics, Amazon.com)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

Supergirl to Introduce Transgender Character in Upcoming Fourth Season

National City just got more inclusive. The creators of Supergirl are planning on introducing a recurring trans character in the series’ upcoming fourth season. The news broke after a casting call went out for a character named Nia Nal. Nal is described as a transgender woman in her early 20s and is being cast with open ethnicity (aka color-blind casting). She may be positioned to take over the newsroom, as she comes in with a strong journalism background like Snapper Carr (what happened to him?) and is described as a “young Cat Grant type.”

According to the casting call description, Nia will be “a confident, wunderkind of a fashionista. Once a political speechwriter, Nia is the newest addition to the CatCo investigative reporting team. With her she brings a sparkling wit and biting humor but under that banter-y, chic facade, lays a soulful young woman who has much to offer the world.”

Nia Nal would be the first transgender character to appear in the CW’s DC universe, and it’s exciting to have a character stepping into Cat Grant’s place. After a strong first season, Supergirl has struggled to find its footing after Calista Flockhart left the series when production moved to Vancouver. In the current timeline, Cat Grant is off working as a press secretary for President Olivia Marsdin (Lynda Carter), so the door is always open for her return.

Supergirl executive producer and writer Greg Berlanti spoke at the DC in D.C. event about the lack of trans representation in the larger Arrowverse, saying “We don’t have an active trans character across the shows, you know. And we had a trans actress playing a trans character in a show I did that was not a superhero show, eleven years ago. And so I still feel behind the times every day on that issue.”

Cat Grant was a compelling character, and the series has attempted to push other co-stars into her position at CatCo with diminishing returns. Supergirl continues to struggle with James Olson, after abruptly eliminating him as a potential romantic partner for Kara. Since then, Olson has taken over running CatCo and started moonlighting as the vigilante Guardian. He has also started a romantic relationship with Lena Luthor, another character who was poised to fill Cat Grant’s shoes when she bought out CatCo. CatCo and Kara’s life as a reporter has largely been sidelined in the third season, and the series has suffered for it. Here’s hoping Nia Nal can bring the focus back to CatCo and prove a worthy colleague for Kara Danvers.

(via ComicBook.com, image: The CW)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

Disney’s Best Live-Action Adaptation, Maleficent, is Finally Getting a Sequel

Angelina Jolie in Maleficent (2014)

The sequel to Disney’s Maleficent with Angelina Jolie in the titular role is officially happening. Angelina Jolie and Ellie Fanning will both be returning as Maleficent and Aurora, respectively, with Michelle Pfeiffer as Queen Ingrith (a new character), Harris Dickinson as Prince Phillip, and Chiwetel Ejiofor, Ed Skrein, and Robert Lindsay as yet unknown characters.

I’ve always liked Maleficent. I saw it when it first came out, I have a poster that they were giving away for it, I have it on Blu-Ray. While it is by no means an amazing movie, in my opinion, it was still a good movie—and unfortunately, it was not an indicator of the level of creativity that would continue on in future live-action Disney adaptations.

A lot of the feedback I remember hearing about Maleficent was critical of turning the character from the petty vengeful mistress of all evil to a sympathetic survivor of assault who was unleashing her rage against the man who wronged her, with Maleficent serving as essentially a freedom fighter for the fairies. And while I deeply agree that we should have female villains who are motivated by their own wickedness, that was never the point of Maleficent, and focusing on that ignores all the good things the movie did do.

For one, it wasn’t a “paint-by-numbers but add CGI” version of the original Disney movie, Sleeping Beauty. In fact, the movies are so different they can really exist without one another. Maleficent AND Aurora are both given depth as characters, with Maleficent’s rage being healed by the love she grows to feel for the young human girl she cursed.

One of the things I remember adoring was the fact that Aurora is not saved by a true love’s kiss from Phillip, who does appear in the movie towards the end, but from Maleficent, because romantic love isn’t the only kind that matters. That’s awesome to see in an adaptation of a ’50s movie that, while iconic, is really just about two pretty rich white kids getting together in the end.

The problem I’ve had with the Disney live-action films since has never been that I don’t want to see the story done differently; I just want creativity.

What is the point of watching Beauty and the Beast in live action if the changes between it and the animated film are minimal and the changes that were made to “explain plot holes” only raise new plot holes? It can’t exist as its own thing because there isn’t much there. Plus, Emma Watson, while lovely, was not ever going to be Belle in either acting or singing.

We live in a Shape of Water is an Oscar-winner world, and we don’t need our beast boyfriends to turn into generic hotties anymore. Hell, even Shrek 1 & 2 understood that.

Live action Cinderella just seemed fairly reductive considering we’ve had so many versions of the Cinderella story that have improved upon some of the more problematic elements of the Disney story. Ever After, Into the Woods, and Cinderella III: A Twist in Time manages to make Cinderella a character with agency, but still kind and caring without being the doormat she becomes in the Disney live-action 2015 film.

Even Disney’s Descendents knows how to have fun with itself and doesn’t bog itself down with needing to be “reverent.”

With Mulan and The Lion King in the works, I’m certain those films will make a ton of money, but I’m hoping that they will at least try to not just cash in on nostalgia completely and attempt to also make their own thing. It isn’t hard to make a progressive Disney live-action adaptation. For all Beauty and the Beast‘s talk about being “feminist,” Maleficent managed to sell that idea better without having to slap the label all over the tin.

What will be coming up in Maleficent II? Here is what we know thus far according to i09:

A fantasy adventure that picks up several years after Maleficent, in which audiences learned of the events that hardened the heart of Disney’s most notorious villain and drove her to curse a baby Princess Aurora, Maleficent II continues to explore the complex relationship between the horned fairy and the soon to be Queen, as they form new alliances and face new adversaries in their struggle to protect the moors and the magical creatures that reside within.

Two female leaders having conflicts while balancing their mother/daughter relationship? Sign me up. At the end of the day, it’ll be worth it to see Angelina Jole in that red lipstick again.

(via io9, image: Disney)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

Please Admire this Gorgeous Concept Art of Taika Waititi as Boba Fett

Taika Waititi

The incredible comic book artist and illustrator Phil Noto set our hearts aflutter when he drew Boba Fett modeled after one of our favorite men working in entertainment.

Taika Waititi’s quirky vision turned Thor: Ragnarok into a fantastically fun superhero movie—effectively giving Thor a new, vibrantly colored lease on life—and the multi-talented director is also an actor. He played Korg in Ragnarok, as well as Viago in his What We Do in the Shadows, and he’s appeared in a variety of movies and television for the past two decades.

Perhaps Waititi’s background as an actor was on the mind of Phil Noto when he drew Waititi in full Boba Fett gear. Disney recently announced a standalone Fett movie centered around the infamous bounty hunter, and Noto has now given us the Fett we deserve.

I’m not going to be able to picture anyone else in the role until official casting—psst, Disney, take notice:

Call me crazy, but I think it could work. @taikawaititi

A post shared by Phil Noto (@philnoto) on

As Stuff.co.nz points out in compiling a list of other Kiwi actors who could play Fett, “2002’s Attack of the Clones established the Kamino-born Boba and his ‘clone’ Dad Jango as very much Polynesian in looks and sporting our distinctive vowel sounds.” In Attack of the Clones, Jango Fett is played by New Zealander Temuera Morrison, who is of Māori descent. Actor Daniel Logan, also Māori, played a youthful Boba Fett in Clones at the age of 14. The Māori heritage that Morrison, Logan, and Waititi all share means that Waititi as Fett would stay true to the character’s cultural incarnation.

It’s essential that the Boba Fett film cast an actor of color as Fett, and he should be a Māori actor; as our Princess Weekes explained, this will be the first Star Wars movie with an actor of color leading an eponymous film. If Fett is whitewashed, we will riot in the streets, but I don’t think Disney or director James Mangold are stupid enough to make that kind of decision. I’m crossing my fingers and my toes for good measure.

Waititi would make a compelling choice for Fett. While we have no idea when in the Star Wars timeline the Fett movie will take place, it’d be nice if this wasn’t just another “young X” take on a character. Waititi, at 42, could embody Fett’s later adventures, especially since it seems that he may have survived that Sarlacc pit, and a contemporary Fett could potentially appear in other Star Wars properties. Who knows—maybe Boba Fett has a sly sense of humor as yet undiscovered.

Casting dreams aside, Noto’s depiction of Waititi as Fett is just stunning. Noto knows his Star Wars well, having worked on comics like Chewbacca and Poe Dameron, and I couldn’t love this more if I tried.

Oher Star Wars creatives are thumbs-upping Noto’s vision:

Just think of the pun potential, friends.

From our lips to Disney’s ears, please.

(image: Phil Noto on Instagram, Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

Our New Hero: Genderqueer Middle Schooler Wears Transgender Flag as a Cape to Meet Betsy DeVos

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is still taking time out of her busy schedule of rolling back protections for victims of sexual assault and suggesting that schools might want to call ICE on undocumented children to visit a couple of public schools. (And all that despite her utter lack of experience with the public school system before taking the position that oversees it.)

On a recent visit to Michigan’s Grand Rapids Public Museum School, DeVos met our new hero, 14-year-old genderqueer 8th grader Torin Hodgman. According to Michigan Live, Hodgman came prepared with a question for a planned roundtable discussion. They wanted to ask DeVos what she’s doing “to ensure schools are safe learning environments for LGBT students and others who are questioning their gender identity.”

It’s an important question, seeing as 75% of transgender students have reported feeling unsafe at school. As Hodgman notes, “Out of all LGBTQ … and actually all teenagers, transgender and questioning people have a higher rate of suicide and deaths than anybody else.”

Hodgman didn’t get a chance to ask their question, but I’m guessing they still made an impact on DeVos, as they showed up to the meet & greet wearing the transgender flag as a glorious floor-length cape. Lando would be proud.

Hodgman said the point they wanted to make was simply that DeVos can’t ignore trans students because they’re a very real presence in schools. “Public schools are a place for all children,” they said.

DeVos does have a history of ignoring or outright discriminating against LGBTQ students. Since she’s been serving as secretary, the Department of Education has rolled back Obama-era guidelines giving transgender students the right to use the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity, calling it a state or local issue and dismissing all the reasons why federal guidelines were needed in the first place. (Hint: those state and local level decision don’t always work out so well for marginalized students.) She’s refused to pledge that federal money wouldn’t go to schools that discriminate against LGBTQ students and the Education Department is also no longer investigating complaints of discrimination from transgender students barred from using their bathroom or locker room.

Well done, Torin Hodgman, for finding such an awesome way to protest/silently troll DeVos during her visit.

(via The Slot, image: screencap)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

Arrow Reveals Its Mostly Female Writing Room for Season 7

Since the unjust and unnecessary death of Dinah Laurel Lance, played by Katie Cassidy, in Arrow season four, Arrow and I have been on a break. I tune in to see Black Siren (the E2 version of Laurel Lance played again by Katie Cassidy) every once in awhile, but the show has always struggled with having really inconsistent writing of female characters.

It’s a problem that exists across most of the Arrow-verse with the exception of the female-led series Supergirl and Black Lightning. From what I’ve seen from the fandom on Legends, only Sara Lance is really ever every talked about among the female teammates with any real admiration.

While there is certainly no 100% guarantee that having a majority female writing room means all the female characters from Arrow will be given their due, it still makes me happy to see that the room includes majority women and a has some real diversity. Even if they end up doing a lot of Olicity, I would rather accept Olicity that gives Felicity some character, agency, and storylines outside of Oliver than see Felicity continue to be the wish-fulfillment love interest she’s been for most of the series.

Now that Katie Cassidy is returning as a series regular in her Earth-2 form, I’d be excited to see if we can actually get some genuine female friendship among the remaining female characters on Arrow. The only time we’ve really seen the women of the Arrowverse “hang out” is for Iris’ bachelorette party. Plus, to double down on that “intelligent female villain” request, can you please give us that? Or that the very least bring in an Earth-2 Amanda Waller?

What do you think Arrow fans? What do you want the writers to work on or fix in season seven?

(image via The CW)

(via Twitter, image: The CW)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Powered by WPeMatico

LOL! David Beckham pokes fun at Victoria as she does THIS whilst working out

We’re not sure VB will be pleased about this!

David Beckham and Victoria Beckham at Louis Vuitton show, Arrivals, Fall Winter 2018, Paris Fashion Week Men’s 18 January 2018

David Beckham might have been married to wife Victoria for over 18 years but it looks like they haven’t tired of having a laugh at each other’s expense.

The former footballer couldn’t help but poke fun at his other half on Wednesday as he filmed her running on a treadmill and seemingly flapping her arms about at the same time.

READ MORE CELEB NEWS

MORE: Sushi and culture! See inside David Beckham and son Brooklyn’s amazing boys trip to Japan

‘Y tho,’ David, 43, captioned the clip along with a crying with laughter face emoji.

It’s likely that Victoria, 44, may have been completely oblivious to her husband filming her workout antics as she was wearing large headphones whilst training.

The fashion designer also sported a plain black vest and leggings to carry out her, um, interesting way of hitting the treadmill.

Unfortunately David appeared to delete the clip soon after posting it, which comes just a few days after Victoria tried to shrug off the criticism over her sour face at the Royal Wedding.

The mum-of-four drew criticism from many viewers for failing to crack a smile at the nuptials of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle but laughed this off with an Instagram photo posted last week.

VB shared a snap of herself modelling a sweater featuring the caption ‘It’s a dark but happy place’ and wrote: ‘When you’re smiling on the inside 😂😂😂 As the sweatshirt says!!’

Meanwhile Becks ignored the controversy when he congratulated the newlyweds on social media later on.

‘What a proud day for our country today! Watching Harry as happy as he was makes us all proud of the man and person he has always been…what a day!’ the sports star told his Instagram followers.

Since then David has been spending quality time with his sons, having jetted off to Tokyo for a trip with 19-year-old Brooklyn last week.

He’s also enjoyed a spot of fishing with Brooklyn and Romeo, 15, following the getaway.

Lovely day fishing with the boys today 🎣♥ @brooklynbeckham @romeobeckham

A post shared by David Beckham (@davidbeckham) on

Looks like fun to us!

The post LOL! David Beckham pokes fun at Victoria as she does THIS whilst working out appeared first on CelebsNow.

Powered by WPeMatico